Recent Developments at a Glance – Second Edition
Justitia's series Recent Developments at a Glance is a round up recent workplace law cases and news that constitute noteworthy developments, or indeed cautionary tales. Issues to think about.
Justitia's series Recent Developments at a Glance is a round up recent workplace law cases and news that constitute noteworthy developments, or indeed cautionary tales. Issues to think about.
In the nex ... Read more
Insights f ... Read more
In July each year, an number of thresholds and limits relating to the employment relationship change. Here is our handy guide.
Imagine th ... Read more
Did you kn ... Read more
Federal c ... Read more
The restr ... Read more
In July each year, an number of thresholds and limits relating to the employment relationship change. Here is our handy guide.
World Breastfeeding Week runs from 1 to 7 August 2024. This year’s theme was ‘breastfeeding support for all’.
Justitia Lawyers and Consultants is pleased to announce boutique Melbourne Law Firm, Toop Workplace Law is merging with the firm.
From 26 August 2024 (or 26 August 2025 for small businesses), employees gain a new right in the workplace, the ‘right to disconnect’.
Workplace investigations are becoming increasingly commonplace (and more complex) in what can be a fast-paced, pressured decision-making environment, whether you work in the corporate or government sector. Such investigations can quickly become media spectacles, affecting the reputation of even the most prominent organisations and the most innocent of participants.
Working remotely has become a hot topic, prompting organisations to carefully navigate requests for flexible arrangements. In a recent decision, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) outlined some factors that may justify denying a working from home (WFH) request
Working remotely has become a hot topic, prompting organisations to carefully navigate requests for flexible arrangements. In a recent decision, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) outlined some factors that may justify denying a working from home (WFH) request
Identifying a workplace’s specific psychosocial risks is not easy. It not only requires research and evidence to inform decision making, but sometimes brave decisions by leaders when their managers are not acting on information they receive about risks, or in fact when that manager themselves is the problem. Creating a safe workplace requires vigilance, empathy, and action from its leaders.
Rejecting a return-to-work plan may lead to disability discrimination risks, as demonstrated by a recent VCAT decision where an employer was ordered to pay $45,000 for pain and suffering, along with over $190,000 for lost income and entitlements, reinforcing the growing trend of substantial awards for anti-discrimination law breaches.
As mentioned in our previous post, working remotely has become a hot topic, prompting organisations to carefully navigate requests for flexible arrangements. In a recent decision, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) outlined some factors that may justify denying a working from home (WFH) request.
Sexual harassment remains worldwide an alarming issue, transcending borders, cultures, and industries. Australia is no exception. Shockingly, 1.3 million Australian women experienced sexual harassment during 2021-2022, while one in three Australian workers has faced such behaviour at their workplace in the past five years.
A recent decision by the Fair Work Commission (FWC) highlights the importance of conducting thorough and fair workplace investigations. In Crook v CITIC Pacific Mining Management Pty Ltd, the FWC reinstated an employee who had been dismissed for engaging in inappropriate conduct of a sexual nature towards a new female trainee, following a flawed investigation.